Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gabriele Datei vs Martins Rocens Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Datei vs Rocens analysis and find out who is favored!
Gabriele Datei vs Martins Rocens Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Datei 1 - 0 Rocens
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Datei has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Rocens has won 42.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Datei, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rocens has won 54.61%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 40.27% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Datei has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rocens has saved 43.53% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Datei has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Rocens winning 53.97% (W/L 34/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Datei has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 5/ 10). Rocens has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 30/ 24), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 51/ 57).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Datei winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Datei winning 2 and Rocens winning 0. The last match between Datei and Rocens was at the M25 Kottingbrunn, 18-07-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Gabriele Datei getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Datei and Rocens have played a deciding set 0 times, with Datei winning 0 times and Rocens 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Datei winning 1, and Rocens 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Datei has played against opponents with an average rank of while Rocens has played against players with an average rank of 25.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Datei has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rocens has won 35% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Datei has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rocens has converted 51.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
42% (10-14)
Career Total W/L
50% (91-92)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
56% (18-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Gabriele Datei | Martins Rocens |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gabriele Datei | Martins Rocens |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (18/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (44/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (418/347) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 59% (10/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 51 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.1 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 39 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 37.69 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (391/668) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 64% (249/391) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (117/278) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 53% (39/73) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (281/611) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (18/13) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (18/32) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (4/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 73% (22/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 27% (22/6) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 20% (10/2) |
Gabriele Datei Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 2-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats 
Pietro Orlando Fellin
Player
Gabriele Datei
51%
(
39 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 6-7(4) 10-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Gabriele Datei
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
20 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Gabriele Datei
Player
Filip Kana
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Martins Rocens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Pietri
Player
Martins Rocens
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
99)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
99)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
Player
Martins Rocens
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-7(1) 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Matej Vocel
Player
Martins Rocens
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martins Rocens
Player
Arthur Laborde
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
49%
(
18 of
37)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
50
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Martins Rocens
Player
Sina Moghimi
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
51%
(
47 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 5-7 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiri Barnat
Player
Martins Rocens
51%
(
45 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
56 of
92)
2
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martins Rocens
Player
Geni Inoue
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
28 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Datei Vs Rocens Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
